Scandoil.com

Claim against Arrow Seismic from CGGVeritas ruled unfounded by the court


Published Apr 9, 2009
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Edit page New page Hide edit links

PGS reports Ramform Sovereign’s first multi-client survey

Petroleum Geo-Services on July 7th 2008 informed the market that CGG Veritas had initiated a law suit against PGS' subsidiary Arrow Seismic ASA (Arrow).

CGG Veritas claimed USD 70 million in damages on basis of the assertion that Arrow had taken on contractual obligations to charter the vessel NB 534 to CGG Veritas. Arrow denied the existence of any such contractual commitment.

On 8 April 2009, Asker and Bærum Tingrett passed judgment in favor of Arrow. The court concludes that CGGV's claim for damages is unfounded. CGGV were ordered to compensate Arrow for its legal costs. The judgment may in principle be appealed to the Court of Appeal.

Tags: CGGVeritas, Petroleum Geo-Services




   

Add a Comment to this Article

Please be civil. Job and promotion will not be added into the comment page.

(Use Markdown for formatting.)

This question helps prevent spam:

+ Larger Font | + Smaller Font
Top Stories

 

 

 

 


 


RSS

RSS
Newsletter
Newsletter
Mobile News
Mobile news

Computer
Our news on
your website


Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter

Contact
Contact
Tips
Do you have any
tips to us

 

sitemap xml


 

Home